Thursday, May 5, 2016

Are you too old to innovate?

When Louis Braille was just 15 years old, he developed the system of reading and writing by means of raised dots. Bill Gates dropped out of college and founded Microsoft when he was only 20 years old. Larry Page and Sergey Brin were 26 and 25 (and not out of college yet) when they invented Google. (Note to HR: maybe we should look into hiring college drop-outs). Einstein was 26 when he published his Special Theory of Relativity.

This could lead one to the depressing hypothesis that our best thinking occurs when we are teenagers and that youth is wasted on the young. One cannot be elected as President of the U.S. until they have reached the dementia-saddled age of 35.

Take heart, there does not seem to be an innovation firewall based on the aggregation of birthdays. In fact, a study conducted by the Ewing Marion Kaufman Foundation of 600+ CEOs and leaders of product development learned that the average age for individuals to start a new high tech firm is 39. Jack Benny would be so proud (take that Millennials! Do you even know who Jack Benny was? Ok, so he's dead - sure, but still - Ha!).

Author Clive Thompson has a piece in Wired Magazine titled "Why Veteran Visionaries Will Save the World", that makes the point that younger innovators tend to see ideas easily because they don't have a grasp on the full complexity of the problems. They are fearless, and have unlimited time and energy to spend (until, you know, they start dating). He says that twentysometing Web prodigies are fun and all, but the veteran visionaries will save the world.

Keep this in mind; young thinkers often have no idea that they are inventing something great - they have no plan, no goal, they're just permuting though ideas and sometimes one will stick.

Older innovators see the true complexity of the world, and if they can get past that daunting self-inflicted trepidation, it is the older inventor that can cause great change directed at solving specific problems.

A report by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) indicates that for an individual to develop a new idea, they first have to learn and understand the information from previous generations in order to add to what is already known. Absorbing the level of learning required to innovate now consumes the first three decades of life. "If one is to stand on the shoulders of giants, one must first climb up their backs, and the greater the body of knowledge, the harder this climb becomes," says the report. See here.

The NBER studied the ages of 55,000 patent holders for new inventions and concluded that the average age for true genius to appear is now just under 40. Again, that's an average. Consider:

  • Grace Hopper started at the age of 39 on an endeavor that became the first software compiler - ten years later. In her 50's she participated in the invention of COBOL. 
  • Benjamin Franklin began work on the Declaration of Independence at age 70; he'd get to inventing bifocals a few years after that. 
  • Steven Jobs founded Apple Computer when he was only 21 in 1976. He left Apple for a while but returned as CEO in 1996 - twenty years later, ten years AFTER that, he gave us the iPhone. Not bad for 55, huh!

Ronald Regan once told about his days campaigning on college campuses where someone said to him, "Governor, we want to talk to you, but I think you should realize that it's impossible for you to understand us - It's sad, but it's impossible for the members of your generation to understand your own children. You weren't raised in a time of instant communications or satellites and computers solving problems in seconds that previously took hours or days or even weeks to solve. You didn't live in an age of space travel and journeys to the moon, of jet travel or high speed electronics." Regan replied, "You're absolutely right. We didn't have those things when we were your age. We invented them."

Innovation knows no age. In fact age, wisdom, and experience make innovation more possible. Don't let the complexity of the world intimidate you - feed on it.

Cynicism is Not a Skill

For six weeks and with about $10,000 I had toiled to create an additional bathroom in my previous home just in time to host some relatives during the holidays. I only had time to throw one of our better bath towels over the curtain rod as this element of decor had not yet been selected. A friend reviewed the new pristine necessary room, shower stall, sink, roomy closet and other accouterments, and remarked, “Nice Curtain.” I secretly hoped he’d get shin splints.

Did you know that the background of the Mona Lisa is drab, she has no eyebrows, and her hands are those of a child.

Turning the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise 1800 degrees takes over a mile, and at that rate of turn, you’re going to lose just about everything on deck that isn’t nailed down.

According to Movie Mistakes, an online web site that tracks such things, the movie Titanic contains over 253 errors, gaffs, or inconsistencies.

Of course, the Mona Lisa is considered one of the greatest pieces of art the world has ever known. The history of the USS Enterprise is unparalleled, and Titanic won 11 Oscars, and was nominated for three more.

Criticizing things is easy - even things that are exquisitely designed and crafted. It takes no special skill or intelligence to find fault with someone else’s work.

Architecture largely permits or precludes a solution’s quality attributes - it neither guarantees nor causes perfection. A review of architecture should not be an assault on lack of perfection, rather it should assess the overall fit to function, identify areas where improvement is actionable, and recognize where incremental progress is evident.

Viewing the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel for even a brief while causes neck spasm that can be difficult to relieve. It takes no special skill to be a cynic.

We often find ourselves asked to assess the quality of a solution, specifically its architecture, which almost by definition is not perfect. Without fail, someone will comment on an aspect we’ve “missed”, something that is not optimal, or just whine. I wish those people to have boils and plantar fasciitis.

Honesty, and objectivity are not synonyms for criticism and negativity. We must strive to recognize that which works, that which doesn’t, and that which is moving in the right direction.

So... what do you think of this post?

Follow by Email